Thread:Zannabanna/@comment-5558012-20140729133651/@comment-5558012-20140729195410

I wanted to go off the results of some polls I created when I proposed a new site policy.

This was what I personally was thinking. Through my time here I've noticed four individuals who I think would make great Admins. One, however, turned inactive so I have three now. I was planning on nominating these three and let the community weigh in about what they think about them. After a certain amount of time, the general discussion would end and open up a vote for at least one of them to become Admins.

If they didn't wish to become Admins, I was thinking of opening general nominations with certain requirements such as length of time on wiki and editing and do the same process. Those that I am thinking of would make those guidelines I am thinking of (at least three months on the wiki and 200 edits).

We could also do a combination of these as well. Afterwards, I will finish writing the promotion and demotion part of the current policy again based off the results to the polls above and the way the process of selecting new Admins goes.

What do you think?